Taiwan retains death penalty but limits use to ‘exceptional’ cases

File: A cold front is moving over the country. eNCA
Hijacked building in Cape Town
Fugitive fraud-accused Michael Lomas is back in SA.
Cultural and Creative Industries Federation of South Africa poster
Michael Lomas back in South Africa. 
File: Geordin Hill-Lewis, Cape Town Mayor. (RODGER BOSCH / AFP)
Fugitive fraud-accused Michael Lomas is back in SA.
TAIPEI CITY – A Taiwan court decided on Friday to retain capital punishment, but ruled its application should be “limited to special and exceptional circumstances”.
READ: Taiwan’s president says wants to work with China after drills
Democratic Taiwan has carried out 35 executions since a moratorium on capital punishment was lifted in 2010, with the latest — that of a 53-year-old man convicted for setting a fire that killed his family — occurring in April 2020.
Campaigners against the death penalty have long argued that the practice, carried out by shooting an inmate in the heart from behind as they lie face-down on the ground, is an inhumane method of punishment. 
The case was brought by the 37 inmates currently on death row in Taiwan to the Constitutional Court, which ruled Friday that it would retain the death penalty. 
“However, the death penalty is a capital punishment after all, and its scope of application should still be limited to special and exceptional circumstances,” said chief justice Hsu Tzong-li during a lengthy readout of the court’s decision.
In a statement, the court said while the right to life will be protected under Taiwan’s constitution, “such protection is not absolute”. 
“The (Taiwan Constitutional Court) emphasized that because death penalty was the most severe punishment and irreversible in nature, its application and procedural safeguard (from investigation to execution) should be reviewed under strict scrutiny,” it said in reference to the crime of murder. 
However, “the judgement did not address the constitutionality of death penalty in general or imposed on other offences”, like treason or drug-related offences.
The court also ruled that imposing the death sentence be “prohibited” for “defendants with mental conditions”. 
Additionally, death row inmates “should not be executed if they had mental conditions to the extent that have impeded their competency for execution”. 
Presidential spokeswoman Karen Kuo called the ruling “an important milestone for Taiwan’s judiciary”.
“The President (Lai Ching-te)… looks forward to the relevant agencies to amend the supporting regulations in accordance with the judgment to meet the values of procedural justice and human rights.”
– Popular in Taiwan –
There are about 50 provisions in Taiwan’s criminal laws that stipulate capital punishment to be the maximum sentence, and executions are carried out without notice once all appeals have been exhausted. 
Capital punishment remains popular in Taiwan, with a recent survey by the Chinese Association for Human Rights showing that 80 percent were in favour of keeping it.
But a lawyer with Judicial Reform Foundation — which campaigns for the abolition of the death penalty — said they “regret the ruling”. 
“From our culture and education, we think there will be better law and order with the death penalty but crime rates didn’t increase — actually it decreased instead — in recent years when we carried out relatively fewer executions,” said Lin Yong-song Friday. 
“We regret that the court didn’t rule it to be unconstitutional… We will work hard to help people understand the importance of respecting life.”
Taiwan is internationally regarded as a bastion of progressive values, as it was the first in Asia in 2019 to legalise marriage equality. 
But it remains a “post-Confucian society,” said death penalty scholar Jimmy Hsu. 
“Revenge as a form of justice in ancient Chinese society — like avenging the deaths of your father or close relatives — has been in the centre and strongly supported by the Confucian elite in the old days,” he told AFP. 
“There are some remnants from the past that still play big roles in the society’s self-understanding.”
By Amber Wang And Yan Zhao